Hall v. Kauffman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered against him and an order denying him a new trial, in an action brought by plaintiff, as road commissioner, to remove and abate an encroachment and obstruction erected by defendant upon a public highway.
*452The court found that the road had, for more than thirty years prior to the commencement of the action, been “ continuously, peaceably, uninterruptedly, notoriously, openly, and with the knowledge and consent- of defendant, and his grantors, used as and for a public highway and road by the public in general, and by all persons who chose to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bailey v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- San Benito County v. WhitesidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re Estate of EdelmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Helm v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.