Legal Opinion
Miller v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1922No. Civ. No. 3950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
By this proceeding petitioner asks that the superior court named as respondent be enjoined from further action in a suit at law in which Frank M. Kelsey, special administrator of the estate of Mary Moore Miller, is plaintiff, and George H. Miller, Jared H. Miller, and Cecil A. Sheward Miller are defendants. The instant proceeding will be referred to as the “proceeding” and the action sought .to be enjoined as the “action.”
It is the theory of petitioner that the superior court has no jurisdiction to try the action. Many authorities are cited by both sides concerning certain legal phases of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lehnhardt v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Rollins v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bielenberg v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Castaic Clay Manufacturing Co. v. DedesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.