Legal Opinion

Syfert v. Solomon

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1928No. Docket No. 3636PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract on the part of defendant to marry plaintiff. The trial was had before a jury and damages in the sum of $40,000 awarded plaintiff. The appeal is from the judgment upon the verdict.

Upon the oral argument appellant moved the court for permission to offer proof that respondent herein was a married woman during all the times mentioned in her complaint. The trial was had before a jury, and under such circumstances an appellate court is not permitted to receive additional evidence of this character or to make any finding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Smith v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. McKane v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Stamm v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Friendship Auto Sales, Inc. v. Bank of Willamette ValleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Abrahamson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API