Legal Opinion

City of North Olmsted v. Eliza Jennings, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1993No. Nos. 63847, 64276PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spbllacy, Presiding Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal. Plaintiff-appellant, the city of North Olmsted (“appellant”), appeals the granting of summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Eliza Jennings, Inc. (“Jennings”), in a dispute over sewer tap-in fees.

Appellant raises the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred in holding that the decision of the Supreme Court in State, ex rel. Eliza Jennings v. Noble, 49 Ohio St.3d 71 (1990), was not retroactive in its operation.
“II. The trial court erred in holding that the city of North Olmsted, by failing to seek a stay of the court of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Crestmont Cleveland Partnership v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Griffith v. LintonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Maghie Savage, Inc. v. P.J. Dick Inc., 08ap-487 (5-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API