Legal Opinion
Adler v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1991No. B050583PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HINZ, J.
Introduction
We affirm the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for mandamus following the Department of Motor Vehicle’s suspension of petitioner’s driving license for failure to comply with the Financial Responsibility Law.
Respondent Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) held a hearing on December 5, 1989, before a referee concerning the suspension of the driving privilege of petitioner and appellant Crystal M. Adler under California Vehicle Code sections 16070 1 and 16071.
On December 8, 1989, the referee’s notice of findings and decision found that Adler was the driver or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniels v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Anacker v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Arellano v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Carrey v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hughes v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- LOHARSINGH v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cabral v. L.A. Cty. Metro. Transp. Auth.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kruger v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.