Legal Opinion
Cabral v. L.A. Cty. Metro. Transp. Auth.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1998No. B113154PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff, an uninsured motorist, brought his car to a stop at the side of a busy city street and parked at the curb, as he was *910permitted to do. As plaintiff was exiting his car, defendant’s bus collided with plaintiff’s car, causing property damage and personal injury. Pursuant to Civil Code section 3333.4,1 the trial court determined plaintiff could not recover noneconomic damages, because plaintiff was an uninsured motorist and his damages arose out of the operation or use of a motor vehicle. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- INT'L BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. v. Truck Ins. Exch.California Supreme Court · 1970
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Kane v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Yoshioka v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Cocking v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Cabral v. LA COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. AUTH.California Court of Appeal · 1998