Legal Opinion

LOHARSINGH v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 11, 2010No. Case C-08-04725 JCSPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 52]

JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This civil rights action involves allegations that officers of the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) violated Plaintiffs constitutional right to be free from unreasonable seizure and excessive force. Defendants bring a motion for partial summary judgment (“the Motion”). All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On Friday, February 26, a hearing on the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jaramillo v. City of San MateoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Warren v. MarcusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Moore v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. (PC) Harris v. MunozDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Berry v. ParodiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API