Prophet v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
¶1. Ronnie and Badon Prophet appeal from the circuit court judgment granting summary judgment to Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Inc. The Prophets argue that the circuit court erred in concluding that Enterprise, by selling insurance to the renter of an Enterprise car in which they were passengers when the car, driven by the renter, collided with a car driven by an uninsured motorist, had not entered into a contract of insurance for which uninsured motorist coverage would have been required under Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2. The facts relevant to resolution of this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Classified Insurance Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Van Erden v. SobczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Van Erden v. SobczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Van Erden v. SobczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.