Legal Opinion
Van Erden v. Sobczak
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 17, 2004No. 02-1595PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*169CURLEY, J.
¶ 1. Steven and Cherie Van Erden appeal from the trial court's order granting summary-judgment and dismissing their declaratory judgment action against the City of Milwaukee, in which the Van Erdens sought a declaration that the City had a duty to offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to Steven Van Erden, as a City employee, in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m)(a)1 (1999-2000).1 The Van Erdens also appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment and dismissing their declaratory judgment action against American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marotz v. HallmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Donna E. Keca and Trisha Bontempo, Individually and as Guardian of Miranda BontempoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Bellile v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Aul v. Golden Rule InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.