Van Erden v. Sobczak
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Steven and Cherie Van Erden appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment and dismissing their declaratory judgment *885action against the City of Milwaukee, in which the Van Erdens sought a declaration that the City had a duty to offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to Steven Van Erden, as a City employee, in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m)(a)l (1999-2000).1 The Van Erdens also appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment dismissing their declaratory judgment action against American Family Mutual Insurance Company, their automobile insurance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Union Midwest Insurance v. VorbeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Van Erden v. SobczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- WPS & Community Health Plan of Wisconsin v. Church Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Klinger v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Commercial Union Midwest Insurance v. VorbeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.