Legal Opinion

Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2001No. 00-1369-CQPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the Supreme Court of North Dakota pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 821.01 (1995-96).1 The parties dispute whether Wolfgang Mau is covered under an underinsured motorist policy. The specific question before the court is: Is Endorsement #1 in the International Extended Protection (IEP) Option valid under Wisconsin law to preclude underin-sured motorist coverage to one who rents a car from Alamo, purchases the IEP Option, and is injured while *1037sitting in a different car? Based on our interpretation of language in the excess policy, we find that Mau…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API