Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the Supreme Court of North Dakota pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 821.01 (1995-96).1 The parties dispute whether Wolfgang Mau is covered under an underinsured motorist policy. The specific question before the court is: Is Endorsement #1 in the International Extended Protection (IEP) Option valid under Wisconsin law to preclude underin-sured motorist coverage to one who rents a car from Alamo, purchases the IEP Option, and is injured while *1037sitting in a different car? Based on our interpretation of language in the excess policy, we find that Mau…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.