Legal Opinion

Johnston v. . Spicer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1887PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Appeal by Henry Spicer and others, defendants, from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 31, 1886, which reversed an order of Special Term directing as to the disposition of surplus, money arising, on foreclosure sale herein. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal by Henry Spicer and others, defendants, from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 31, 1886, which reversed an order of Special Term directing as to the disposition of surplus, money arising, on foreclosure sale herein. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Marriage settlements-were assumed by the legislature, in making the revision of 1830, as an existing mode of providing for the necessities, of families. (Willard on Real Estate, 274; 1R.S. 727-732.) All such contracts made before 1849 remain in full force. (Laws of…

1Opinion of the Court

Ruger, Ch. J.

The controversy in this case arises, among-the heirs of one George Spicer, over the distribution of surplus monevs accruing from a sale of lands under a mortgage foreclosure, and depends for its settlement mainly upon the effect to be given to a contract made between Spicer and one. Ellen Dounagha on June 29, 1847, in contemplation of their marriage.

The appellants claim as legal heirs of George Spicer, and the respondents, who were also a portion of his heirs, claim the exclusive right to these moneys by virtue of a release-from the State, of the interest said to have accrued to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reade v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  2. Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. People Ex Rel. McConvill v. HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. The Sun Mutual Ins. Co. v. . the Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Bradish v. GibbsNew York Court of Chancery · 1818

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re the Appraisal of the Property of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kerrigan's Estate v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Lacey v. PalmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API