Legal Opinion

In Re Simmons

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1926No. Docket No. Crim. 2790PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The petitioner contends that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Kern County after conviction on a charge of violating an ordinance of the city of Bakersfield on a complaint charging him with the possession of intoxicating liquor containing more than one-third of one per cent of alcohol by volume.

Following the decision of this court in In re Mingo, 190 Cal. 769 [214 Pac. 850], the city of Bakersfield passed an emergency ordinance, No. 165 (New Series), prohibiting the “manufacture, sale, storage, serving, gift, transportation, importation or exportation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re MingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re GrovesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API