Legal Opinion
People v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1964No. Crim. 9997PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In two separate eases defendants were charged with violation of section 71.01.1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (Ordinance No. 77,000) in that defendants “did wilfully and unlawfully in the City of Los Angeles, drive a vehicle as defined in section 71.00 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, to wit: A Public Transportation Vehicle, without first having obtained a written Driver’s Permit from the Board of Public Utilities and Transportation of the City of Los Angeles, so to do.”
The municipal court sustained the demurrers of defendants and dismissed each complaint. The People appealed.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rumford v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Lafayette v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- County of Los Angeles v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Save Sunset Strip Coalition v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.