Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 16, 2004No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0151PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Janice Wilson appeals from the trial court’s order granting a new trial rather than dismissing the case on double jeopardy grounds, as she had requested. Because we lack subject matter jurisdiction of the appeal, we dismiss the appeal and instead treat it as a petition for special action. Wilson argues dismissal with prejudice of the underlying charge against her is required under Peak v. Acuna, 203 Ariz. 83, 50 P.3d 833 (2002). We disagree and, therefore, accept jurisdiction but deny relief.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 This is the second appeal in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue SerranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State v. WhelanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. FelixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API