Legal Opinion
Timber Ridge Investments Ltd. v. Marcus
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1995No. 68396PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyke, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Michael A. Marcus, Douglas E. English and David Discenza, lessees d.b.a. VIP Video, appeal a partial summary judgment granted in favor of lessor, plaintiff-appellee, Timber Ridge Investments Limited, in its action for $2,242.35 in accrued common area maintenance (“CAM”) charges and the dismissal of their counterclaim for breach of the lease and for tortious interference with business relations. Appellants claim that questions of fact remain with respect to whether they are liable for CAM charges and whether appellee breached the lease and tortiously…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- French-Tex Cleaners, Inc. v. Cafaro Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Books a Million, Inc. v. H & N ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- New Market Acquisitions, Ltd. v. Powerhouse GymDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Pool v. Insignia Residential GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.