Dunkley v. Shoemate
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
This appeal is from a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of plaintiff’s claim. N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For Rule 12(b)(6) purposes, plaintiffs allegations are taken as true. Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 289 N.C. 71, 83, 221 S.E.2d 282, 290 (1976).
Plaintiff alleges the following: She was hospitalized at University of North Carolina Hospital in Chapel Hill (UNC Hospital) on 25 September 1989 “for care and treatment of depression and debilitating psychological illness.” After her discharge on 10 October 1989, defendant Lee H. Shoemate was assigned to provide her with psychiatric outpatient…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Cox v. Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Piatt v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Brown v. LanierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Storm Ex Rel. Smoler v. Legion InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Dunkley v. ShoemateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Soderlund v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Cottle v. MankinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024