Legal Opinion

Piatt v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7521SC473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a valid claim unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim. Unless the face of the complaint shows an insurmountable bar to recovery, plaintiff’s action should not be dismissed on the pleading. Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161.

Defendant urges that, on its face the paper labeled “Rough Draft” was only a preliminary negotiating agreement and that the parties did not intend to be bound until the execution of a formal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. WallensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunkley v. ShoemateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Hoke v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Lyon v. Continental Trading Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Phillips v. Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API