Legal Opinion

Cox v. Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 8518SC1178PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In his complaint, plaintiff did not identify any specific claim for relief. In his brief, he contends that he has sufficiently alleged claims for abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We agree that the complaint is sufficient for the abuse of process claim. However, under the test established by our Supreme Court in Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979) and Dickens v. Puryear, 302 N.C. 437, 276 S.E. 2d 325 (1981), we hold that plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged — and that the forecast of evidence before the trial court does…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Soderlund v. KuchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DarsieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. MacClements v. LaFoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Dunkley v. ShoemateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Davis v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API