Legal Opinion

Brown v. Lanier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1983No. 824SC178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

This appeal involves interpretation of the provisions of G.S. 1A-1, Rules 7, 8, and 9 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. More specifically, we address the question of whether plaintiff was required to file a reply alleging fraud and misrepresentation. Defendants contend that summary judgment was properly granted because plaintiff failed to specifically plead the fraud he relies on in avoidance of the release. We disagree and reverse.

Rule 7 of the Rules of Civil Procedure allows filing a reply only when, in an answer, a defendant expressly asserts a counterclaim or when the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunkley v. ShoemateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Franklin County v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Towery v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API