Legal Opinion
Ponti v. Burastero
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1952No. Civ. 8124PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem
This is an action for declaratory relief to test the validity of an ordinance of the city of Vallejo which awarded an exclusive garbage disposal contract to defendant Vallejo Garbage Service, and to determine the rights of the individual parties under a contract providing for garbage disposal on dividing territory between them. Plaintiff also sought an alternative judgment against the individual defendants for damages in the sum of $72,200.-
Defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint, and defendant city of Vallejo in its answer joined the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Miller v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re ZhizhuzzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Cornelius v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Saathoff v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Matula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Waste Resource Technologies v. DEPT. OF PUB. HLT. OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Finney v. EstesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.