Legal Opinion

Lebold v. Inland S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 18, 1936No. 5694PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY District Judge ’. „ • • , Appellants minority stockholders of appellee, brought this suit to enjoin appellee from taking any steps to dissolve or to discontinue its corporate existence or any other action tending to interfere with the usual operation of its business. Appellants claimed that the acts of appellee, its directors and its majority stockholder, the inland Steel Company, were such as wrongfully to coerce appellants and to bring about legal injury to them as minority stockholders. Appellee filed its answer, and, upon hearing, the court dismissed the bill for want of equity.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Lebold v. Inland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. In Re the General Realty & Utilities Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  5. Lawrence v. Muter Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API