Legal Opinion

Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 27, 1886PublishedCited by 48 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

When this case was before this court on demurrer, (20 Fed. Rep. 577,) the questions of law arising upon the allegations of the hill were fully considered. It was then determined that, although the majority of stockholders of the Oregon Steam Navigation Company were authorized by the statutes of Oregon, under which the corporation was organized, to dissolve the corporation, dispose of its property, and divide the proceeds despite the opposition of the minority stockholders, and although the majority exercised this authority in the mode which the organic law of the corporation permitted,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston TheatreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Clearwater v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Lebold v. Inland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API