Legal Opinion

In Re the General Realty & Utilities Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 26, 1947PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

The issue here is whether the appraiser committed error in arriving at his determination of the value of the dissenting stockholders’ shares made pursuant to our present appraisal statute.

As a consequence of a merger between General Realty & Utilities Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary Gruco, Inc., both Delaware corporations, certain owners of preferred stock of General Realty & Utilities Corporation dissented and requested an appraisal of their shares. Pursuant to the provisions of our appraisal statute, Section 61, Rev.Code 1935, § 2093, as amended by 43…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  2. Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Meade v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  5. Lebold v. Inland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API