Legal Opinion
Liddell v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1927No. 17013PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, C.
This cause is to review the action of the State Industrial Commission refusing the petitioner an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state of Oklahoma.
The material facts as shown by the record are, substantially, as follows:
On January 3, 1925,- Jack Liddell, petitioner, while employed by the Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Company, according to his own testimony, received an injury while driving a mule in one of the mines of said company at Tahoma, Okla.; that the accident occurred about three o’clock in the afternoon on said date, as a result of mud and water which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hogan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Bedford-Carthage Stone Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Okmulgee Democrat Pub Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Wilkerson v. Devonian Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White Oak Refining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Pioneer Mills Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. HornbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Southern Fuel Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Burns v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.