Legal Opinion
Hogan v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 16, 1922No. 12479PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The petitioners, who were the respondent and insurance carrier, respectively, ¡have filed their petitions in this court joining the State Industrial Commission and James Otto Cherry, who was the claimant, as respondents, to review an order and award made by the State Industrial Commission in a proceeding before it designated as No. 18641, wherein James Otto Cherry was claimant and T. R. Hogan, doing business as the Wilburton Gin Company, was respondent, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was insurance carrier; which order was made on June 25, 1921, and was amended by an order made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carl Hagenbeck & Great Wallace Shows Co. v. LeppertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Rogers v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Hillestad v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Railroad Co. v. DialSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Lucky-Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Harris v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Moore & Gleason v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Cameron Coal Co. v. CollopySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.