Legal Opinion

Northrup v. City of Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1935No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 38,303PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Under its former charter, Act No. 353, Local Acts 1895, and its present charter adopted under the home rule act, 1 Oomp. Laws 1929, § 2228 et seq., the city of Jackson had and has authority to establish sewers and improve Grand River, a natural watercourse, for a certain distance beyond the city limits. For many years the city has emptied its raw sewage into Grand River.

Plaintiffs live on their farm some 12 miles north of the city. Grand River bounds the farm on the north. They claim that increasingly for 10 years, and particularly since 1930, city sewage has polluted the stream at their farm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davidson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Borski v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Springer v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Collinsville v. BrickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Van Auken v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Green v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Swanson v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Penix v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API