Legal Opinion
Patterson v. De Haven
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1928No. Docket No. 3338PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Plaintiff had judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,000 alleged to be due the plaintiff from the defendant for and on behalf of commissions earned in the sale of a certain band of sheep belonging to G. C. Long and his brother, J. R. Long. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The complaint is in three counts. Judgment went for the plaintiff upon the first count, and as the findings of the court are simply general and to the effect that all the of the first count of plaintiff’s complaint are true and correct, it is necessary to set forth the same, which we do, as follows:
“I.
“That…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Nielsen v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Gordon v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Curry v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Rubidoex v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schwarting v. ArtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Vice v. ThackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Lenz v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Myer v. Preferred Credit, Inc.Harrison County Court of Common Pleas · 2001
- Anderson v. Geo. L. Barney Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.