Legal Opinion

Lenz v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The defendant corporation takes the position that “no common law exception should be made to the general principle that there must be privity between the plaintiff and the defendant and that a seller is under no liability to anyone other than a purchaser for the character of the goods he sells.” This suggestion cannot be seriously entertained. Although courts continue to reiterate the conventional formula which states: “The general rule is that a contractor, manufacturer or vendor is not liable to third parties who have no contractual relations with him for negligence in the construction,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Karr v. Inecto, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Orr v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Spherex, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Williams v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API