Legal Opinion

Minners v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1969No. 41719, 41764PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether a so-called “household-exclusion” provision of plaintiff’s automobile liability policy, written by defendant, applies where one driver, William Wiik, has secured a judgment of contribution against the other driver, the plaintiff herein, arising out of their joint negligence in causing the death of plaintiff’s wife. We hold that the exclusion does apply to policies issued prior to July 1, 1969, and therefore reverse.

The decedent, Ella P. Minners, was a passenger in the car of her husband, the plaintiff herein, when it collided with a car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Urhammer v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haines v. Mid-Century InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. GavendaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Parker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SuarezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API