Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Suarez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 1982No. 81-643PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) sought a declaratory judgment that it was not legally obligated to provide liability coverage to its insured, defendant Victor Suarez (Victor), for claims for contribution asserted by defendants Humberto and Celeste Ingles (the Ingles). The circuit court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. Victor appeals, contending (1) the insurance policy clause relied upon by State Farm is ambiguous and therefore unenforceable; and (2) the same clause is void because it violates public policy.

A two-car accident occurred on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gatto v. Walgreen Drug Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Beautiful Signs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. American Management Consultant, LLC v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. NiebuhrAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API