Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Woods

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1892No. 18051PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for an order staying proceedings. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

There was a contest in the court below between C. M. West and George Bronner, as public administrator, for letters of administration of this estate, which was decided in favor of the latter. West appealed from the order appointing Bronner administrator, giving an undertaking on appeal in the sum of three hundred dollars, as provided for in section 941 of the Code of Civil Procedure; but Bronner is proceeding to administer the estate, and the matter now before us is an application by West for an order staying all proceedings until the determination of the appeal.

The undertaking provided for by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Pennie v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gottwals v. RencherNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Woodbine Savings Bank v. YagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. O'Donnell v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jensen v. Hugh Evans & Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Coburn v. HynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API