Legal Opinion

Pennie v. Superior Court of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1891No. 14257PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Certiorari to review and annul an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco requiring an administrator to pay a family allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This is an original proceeding here by certiorari, brought to review and annul an order of the superior court requiring petitioner, as administrator of Thomas Blythe, deceased, to pay a large sum of money to Florence Blythe. The latter had brought an action, under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to have herself decreed to be the adopted child and heir of said Blythe, deceased; and on October 22, 1890, a decree had been entered by the superior court (respondent here) declaring her to be such adopted child and heir. From that decree certain defendants — known generally as the “…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Halsted v. First Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ruggles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API