Jensen v. Hugh Evans & Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This application for a writ of supersedeas presents the question of the extent of discretion which may be exercised by the trial court in requiring a stay bond on appeal under the 1927 amendment to section 949 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1927, p. 874).
In 1935 the plaintiffs Jensen recovered a judgment in the superior court against Hugh Evans, Diversified Real Estate Investments Trust #1, Diversified Real Estate Investments Trust #2, and others. In May, 1938, the sheriff of Los Angeles County levied a writ of execution in aid of the enforcement of said judgment upon deposits…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Born v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Halsted v. First Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- May v. MayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.