Legal Opinion

Woodbine Savings Bank v. Yager

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1932No. File No. 6973PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This cause is before us on rehearing. The appellant is the administrator of the estate of Henry Yager, deceased. The plaintiff instituted this action against Ben Yager, an heir of the decedent, and summoned the appellant administrator as garnishee defendant. The trial court made findings and entered judgment for the plaintiff in the garnishment proceedings, and in our former opinion, reported in 58 S. D. 542, 237 N. W. 761, we granted a reversal with directions to dismiss the proceedings. The respondent now urges that the appellant has no appealable interest and that the appeal should be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Randall v. Burk TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bryant v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Alexander v. BerkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. In re the Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. StilphenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Holt v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Matter of Estate of SavageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Graff v. EngebretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In Re Reeves' EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API