Ankney v. Franch
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The challenge to the lower court’s judgment presented by appellant Ankney stems from rulings by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County that struck the testimony of two witnesses offered by Ankney as experts in workers’ compensation law and consequently determining that there was no evidence of malpractice committed by appellee Franch, Ankney’s lawyer. He had counselled her that she would not succeed in appealing an adverse decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (the Commission) opining that Ankney was barred from future workers’ compensation benefits…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Tracey v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State Department of Health v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Radman v. HaroldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franch v. AnkneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Saadeh v. Saadeh, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Central GMC, Inc. v. LaganaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Uninsured Employers' Fund v. W.M. Schlosser Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.