Franch v. Ankney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in striking the testimony of two *354expert witnesses in an attorney malpractice case on the ground that the experts’ opinions were based on an erroneous interpretation of Maryland law. We hold that the judge’s ruling did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
I
This appeal stems from an attorney malpractice action brought in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in 1988 by Respondent Lottie Ankney (Ankney) against William A. Franch (Franch), Petitioner, alleging negligence in Franch’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hartless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State, Use of Stickley v. CritzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. MashburnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Massie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Steele v. D.C. Tiger MarketDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.