Legal Opinion

Plooster v. Pierce Packing Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1993No. 91-551PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

The claimant, Joan Plooster, filed a petition in the Workers’ Compensation Court alleging that the respondent, State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund (State Fund), was responsible for payment of certain medical bills which it had refused to pay. Shortly before trial, the State Fund conceded liability for payment of the medical bills. At trial, the issues decided were whether claimant was entitled to a statutory penalty, attorney fees, and costs. The Honorable Nat Allen, substituting for Judge Timothy Reardon, found that respondent had acted unreasonably when it delayed payment of claimant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wight v. Hughes Livestock Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ness v. Anaconda Minerals Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Williams v. Plum Creek Timber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Chapman v. Research CottrellMontana Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API