Legal Opinion

S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2000No. 99-375PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 S.L.H. filed a petition with the Workers’ Compensation Court to resolve a dispute regarding disability benefits, medical benefits and the State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund’s (State Fund) subrogation claim. S.L.H. now appeals the court’s findings that she had a 1% mental impairment rating; that her time of injury job was medium-duty; and that certain of the State Fund’s actions did not entitle S.L.H. to an award of penalties, attorney fees, and costs. Montana Trial Lawyers Association (MTLA) filed an amicus brief limited to the mental impairment rating issue. The State Fund has not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. Michael LetaskyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Hiett v. Missoula County Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 2003

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API