St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Hurst

On Nov ember 6, 1937, Virgil Hill filed suit against appellants in the CraAvford circuit court to recoATer damages alleged to haAre been sustained by him on November 3, 1937, Avhilc in employ of appellants, engaged in removing a piling from a bridge on the St. Paul branch in Madison county, Arkansas. He Avas represented in this suit by George A. Hurst, an attorney at FayetteATi]le, Arkansas, and the firm of Partain & Agee, attorneys at Van Burén, Arkansas.

Prior to the institution of the above suit, Hill on NoA'ember 5, 1937, had entered into a Avritten contract AAÚth i\lr. Hurst to represent…