Legal Opinion

Ness v. Anaconda Minerals Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1996No. 96-038PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellant Harry A. Ness (Ness) appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court concluding that Ness was entitled to total disability benefits only until September 11, 1989, the date on which Anaconda Minerals Company (Anaconda) properly discharged its duties to investigate the extent of Ness’s disability and to notify Ness of the results of that investigation. Anaconda cross appeals the Worker’s Compensation Court’s determination that Anaconda was not entitled to subrogate the benefits it had paid against Ness’s settled third party claim, as well as the court’s determination that Ness…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Francetich v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wood v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hall v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Royal Insurance v. RoadarmelMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. McMillanMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Shattuck v. Kalispell Regional Medical Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Davis v. Credit GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API