Legal Opinion

Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1981No. 80-282PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

In this action the claimant, Richard J. Holton, the employer, F. H. Stoltze Land and Lumber Company, and the insurer, Scott Wetzel Services, Inc., appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court awarding 40% disability of the whole man, refusing to admit an economist’s expert testimony, denying imposition of a 20% penalty, and awarding attorney fees from the claimant’s benefits.

Richard J. Holton injured his back while “pulling on the green chain” at the Stoltze sawmill on November 8, 1972. In January 1973 claimant’s physician, Dr. Burton, performed a laminectomy and disc removal.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fermo v. Superline ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wight v. Hughes Livestock Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Musil v. J.A. Baldwin Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Phelan v. Lee Blaine EnterprisesMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Grimshaw v. L. Peter Larson Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lamb v. Missoula Imports, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API