Legal Opinion

Friedman v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1940No. 25630. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellants, the city of Chicago and its comptroller, have appealed from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook county awarding a writ of mandamus compelling them to accept from appellees certain special assessment bonds in payment of delinquent assessments levied against the properties of appellees. The validity of a statute is involved, hence the direct appeal.

No question of fact is involved, as the facts are stipulated. They are, that appellee Friedman owned certain real estate in the city of Chicago against which a special assessment payable in five annual installments, with interest at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Noesen v. ErkenswickIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Whedon v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McDonald v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stigler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. New York Life Insurance v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Daniels v. CavnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Schreiber v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API