Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Loomis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Edward F. McDonald and John McDonald are sons of Allen F. McDonald, deceased, and Martin Loomis is a son-in-law. This action was brought by deceased’s son Edward F. McDonald as his executor to recover upon a promissory note for $1,000 dated December 14, 1921, running for two years with interest at 6 per cent, per annum, given to deceased by defendant Martin Loomis and indorsed by John and Edward F. McDonald who waived presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, etc., consenting to any renewal of the note which might be made. The action was begun by attachment against the property of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friedman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Peterson v. Crown Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. State Street Trust Co. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. In Re KirschenbaumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Norton v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API