Legal Opinion

Stigler v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1971No. 43104PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The plaintiff, a year-old minor child, resided with his family in a privately-owned apartment located in the City of Chicago. The complaint alleged that the building where the apartment was located was in a deteriorative condition, and that the walls had been covered with a paint, analyzed as containing a high level of lead, which tended to fall from the walls in flakes. The complaint further alleged that the plaintiff, on or about July 14, 1966, ingested quantities of this paint causing injuries to him, and that the defendant, City of Chicago, was liable.

The city moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Huey v. the Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gardner v. Village of Chicago RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Howard v. LawtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Anundson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Osborn v. Village of River ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Halvorson v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API