Legal Opinion
State v. Jaynes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 20, 1994No. 13076PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).2 The defendant claims that (1) the trial court and the state’s attorney improperly denied him access to exculpatory material, (2) the trial court improperly admitted identification testimony into evidence, (3) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on intent to kill, and (4) the trial court improperly failed to conduct a hearing as to whether a juror felt pressured. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*419The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ChasseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. McCollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.