Ford v. Nokomis State Bank
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— The sole question to determine on this appeal is whether, when property has been once sold under a judgment and execution sale for less than the amount of the judgment, and thereafter redeemed by the grantee of the judgment debtor, it can again be sold under execution on the deficiency remaining on the judgment after the first sale. It must be admitted that there is great latitude for diversity and choice of opinions. His Honor, the trial judge, after tracing the course of legislation in this state, and other states of similar character, and after analyzing the provisions of the various…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phyfe v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- DeRoberts v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Atwood v. McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Provident Mut. Life Ins. v. University Evangelical Lutheran Church of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- GESA Federal Credit Union v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mansfield v. McRearyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.