Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. McReary

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1972PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action by a guarantor against her co-guarantors to enforce contribution. All defendants defaulted except the defendants Mr. and Mrs. MeBeary. The trial court entered judgment against the McRearys, who appealed, contending they should not have been required to contribute. The plaintiff cross-appealed, contesting the manner in which the judgment was fashioned and arguing that the amount the McRearys were required to contribute was inadequate.

The defendants Denton, Staben, Nicholas, A. G-. Mansfield, and Ronald McReary were stockholders and officers of a newly formed corporation,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorimer v. Julius Knack Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lindblom v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hall v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Ford v. Nokomis State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Todd v. WindsorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Hostmann v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. (In Re XTI Xonix Technologies, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  3. Kahn v. WeldinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Weitz v. MarramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Charles H. Alberding v. Everett S. M. Brunzell and Dana Brunzell, Charles H. Alberding v. Everett S. M. Brunzell and Dana BrunzellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API