Legal Opinion

Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. Mark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1989No. 54588-0PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This case involves the redemption of real property sold by the sheriff at an execution sale. We hold that a judgment debtor's statutory right of redemption can be effectively conveyed only through compliance with real property transfer statutes.

Facts

In 1971, Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank loaned $50,000 to Albert and Mae Mark and secured the loan with a first mortgage on their house. In 1972, E. Louise Whittall loaned the Marks $10,000 and secured the loan with a second *49mortgage on their house. The Internal Revenue Service made various assessments upon the Marks' failure to pay their federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. DeRoberts v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. W. T. Watts, Inc. v. SherrerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Call v. Thunderbird Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. GESA Federal Credit Union v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ford v. Nokomis State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Performance Construction, App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. P.H.T.S., LLC v. Vantage Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Martin Prop., Inc. v. Florida Industries Inv. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API