Legal Opinion

Eastwood v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1932No. 23702. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Miss Eastwood, seeks recovery of damages from the city of Seattle, alleged as the result of the negligence of the city in the operation of one of its street cars, causing her personal injuries. Trial in the superior court for Kang county, sitting with a jury, resulted in a verdict in favor of the city. Miss Eastwood, by her counsel, moved for a new trial, which motion was by the court granted. An order was entered accordingly, from which the city has appealed to this court.

It is first contended in behalf of the city that the claim for damages presented by Miss Eastwood to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wagner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Lindquist v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Frasier v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Titus v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duschaine v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sopchak v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Carlson v. AhlWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API